POLITIZINE.COM
POLITICS, MUSIC, MODERN TIMES & MORE ... SINCE 2002
Sunday, January 29, 2012
Vanity Fairs, piling up ...
Four months worth of Vanity Fairs have been piling up in my house. I'm finally getting a chance to at least breeze through them. One thing is becoming clear though: Editor Graydon Carter and the team are a little obsessed about Rupert Murdoch and the phone hacking scandal. Just sayin' ...
Saturday, January 28, 2012
Jobs of the Top 1% of households
Interesting graphic here from the NYT two Sundays ago: ["The Top 1 Percent: What Jobs Do They Have?"]. Now, it's important to note, that these are the top households, not individuals. So, when you see cops, teachers, and, ahem, journalists, on the list, they are probably living with more affluent individuals.
Although, at the same time, in order to be in the Top 1 percent, a household needs to have as much as $343,000, adjusted gross income, according to Bankrate.com: ["Top 1 Percent: How Much Do They Earn?"].
So, in real terms, police and teachers are only in the Top 10 to 15 percent of household wage earners in the country, depending on the number of years in, overtime, detail pay, deductions, and what their spouses earn, etc.
Although, at the same time, in order to be in the Top 1 percent, a household needs to have as much as $343,000, adjusted gross income, according to Bankrate.com: ["Top 1 Percent: How Much Do They Earn?"].
So, in real terms, police and teachers are only in the Top 10 to 15 percent of household wage earners in the country, depending on the number of years in, overtime, detail pay, deductions, and what their spouses earn, etc.
The Jirga Medal of Honor
In the Public Interest By Ralph Nader 1/24/12
The U.S. war in Afghanistan is testing so much futuristic
detect and destroy weaponry that it can be called the most advanced all-seeing
invasion in military history. From blanket satellite surveillance to soldiers’
infra-red vision to the remotely guided photographing, killer drones to the
latest fused ground-based imagery and electronic signal intercepts, the age of
robotic land, sea, and air weaponry is at hand.
U.S. and NATO soldiers and contractors greatly outnumber
the Taliban, whose sandals and weapons are from the past century. Still, with
the most sophisticated arsenals ever deployed, why are U.S. generals saying
that less than 30,000 Taliban fighters, for almost a decade, have fought the
U.S. led forces to a draw?
Sunday, January 15, 2012
Iran: The Neocons Are At It Again
In the Public Interest by Ralph Nader 1/11/12
The same neocons who persuaded George W. Bush and crew
to, in Ron Paul’s inimitable words, “lie their way into invading Iraq” in 2003,
are beating the drums of war more loudly these days to attack Iran. It is
remarkable how many of these war-mongers are former draft dodgers who wanted
other Americans to fight the war in Vietnam.
With the exception of Ron Paul, who actually knows the
history of U.S.-Iranian relations, the Republican presidential contenders have
declared their belligerency toward Iranian officials who they accuse of moving
toward nuclear weapons.
The Iranian regime disputes that charge, claiming they
are developing the technology for nuclear power and nuclear medicine.
Tuesday, January 3, 2012
Is Best Buy going under?
Interesting column here from Forbes: ["Why Best Buy is Going out of Business...Gradually"].
It is (or was) bound to happen when you consider what is going on in the world, especially with music, books, soon movies, and other types of products that can be downloaded or purchased online. The big chain stores - that gobbled up all the business from the small stores - are going to go the way of the dinosaur at some point. What goes around comes around, as the saying goes.
It is (or was) bound to happen when you consider what is going on in the world, especially with music, books, soon movies, and other types of products that can be downloaded or purchased online. The big chain stores - that gobbled up all the business from the small stores - are going to go the way of the dinosaur at some point. What goes around comes around, as the saying goes.
Sunday, January 1, 2012
A $4 million vaca? Really?
It looks like it: ["With More Vacation Days and Separate Travel, Price of Obama’s Annual Hawaiian Holiday Rises"].
In fairness, the president, or any president actually, can vacation wherever they like. But this is getting a bit ridiculous. Jetting off here; traveling over there; playing golf there, etc. The next thing you'll read is the Democrats blaming Republicans for the high cost of the vacation because they stalled a bill which kept Obama from leaving with Michele or something trivial like that.
In fairness, the president, or any president actually, can vacation wherever they like. But this is getting a bit ridiculous. Jetting off here; traveling over there; playing golf there, etc. The next thing you'll read is the Democrats blaming Republicans for the high cost of the vacation because they stalled a bill which kept Obama from leaving with Michele or something trivial like that.
Monday, December 26, 2011
Why you should keep everything ...
at least if you're a reporter, journalist, interviewer, or whatever. You never know when you might need the information again. Take this piece from the Washington Post by Bob Woodward: ["In his debut in Washington’s power struggles, Gingrich threw a bomb"].
There are only two pages of the article available online - you have to pay for the rest - but you get the idea.
It's interesting that Woodward, who is probably better known now for his books than any reporting he did in the old days, never published this interview. Maybe he was working on a Republican revolution book that he never finished; maybe he sensed something was in the water.
There are only two pages of the article available online - you have to pay for the rest - but you get the idea.
It's interesting that Woodward, who is probably better known now for his books than any reporting he did in the old days, never published this interview. Maybe he was working on a Republican revolution book that he never finished; maybe he sensed something was in the water.
Saturday, December 24, 2011
Recommended Holiday Reading for the Caring, Agitated Mind
Guest perspective by Ralph Nader
1. America Beyond Capitalism by Gar Alperovitz (Democracy
Collaborative Press and Dollars and Sense, 2011). If you want to see how
community economies are spreading to displace the sales and influence of
companies such as Bank of America, ExxonMobil, Aetna, ADM and McDonalds, this
is your book. Democratic credit unions, local renewable and efficient energy,
community health clinics and farmer-to-consumer markets are some of the
possibilities outlined in this optimistic book.
2. Retirement Heist: How Companies Plunder and Profit
from the Nest Eggs of American Workers by Ellen E. Schultz (Portfolio/Penguin
Hardcover, 2011), award-winning reporter for The Wall Street Journal. This book
meticulously documents how big business and their attorneys avariciously turned
pension plans into piggy banks, tax shelters and profit centers, at the expense
of millions of trusting, loyal workers. This is the searing story of corporate
greed on steroids.
Friday, December 16, 2011
Congressional Tyranny, White House Surrender
Guest perspective By Ralph
Nader/In the Public Interest
Paraphrasing Shakespeare, something is rotten in the
state of Capitol Hill. A majority of Congress is just about to put the
finishing touches on an amendment to the military budget authorization
legislation that will finish off some critical American rights under our
Constitution.
Here is how two retired 4 star marine generals, Charles
C. Krulak and Joseph P. Hoar, described in the New York Times the stripmining
of your freedom to resist tyranny in urging a veto by President Obama:
“One provision would authorize the military to indefinitely
detain without charge people suspected of involvement with terrorism, including
United States citizens apprehended on American soil. Due process would be a
thing of the past….
Saturday, December 10, 2011
More data about the Top 1% and income inequality
Finally catching up on issues of the WSJ that have been sitting around this week and found this piece from Dec. 6, to be quite interesting: ["Tax Rates, Inequality and the 1%"].
While one might find anything written by a fellow from the Cato Institute suspect, there are a few nuggets of truth in here that are worthy of further analysis.
First, the share of income increased by the Top 1% post 1979 seems to not be as drastic as first thought, especially when looking post 2007. It's 11.3 percent not 17 percent, according to Alan Reynolds' analysis.
While one might find anything written by a fellow from the Cato Institute suspect, there are a few nuggets of truth in here that are worthy of further analysis.
First, the share of income increased by the Top 1% post 1979 seems to not be as drastic as first thought, especially when looking post 2007. It's 11.3 percent not 17 percent, according to Alan Reynolds' analysis.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)